observer Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 ... and no doubt some compen! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgusted Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 (edited) Wouldn't receipt of money, imply some form of delayed prostitution? Really? I mean really, this is how low you and your winking smilies can stoop? What a complete <REMOVED !!> you are obs, not that anyone who has been on here any length of time could doubt it, but this takes the biscuit. Edited November 3, 2012 by Dizzy 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgusted Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 ... and no doubt some compen! please, I know he posts a mountain of posts, but at some point, decency surely means he has to be banned? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P J Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 God I hope the last 2 posts don't get moderated, they are hilariously true. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 God was not on your side tonight PJ Â Fatshaft... while clearly Obs comment rattled you (and I am not saying it shouldn't have) I'm sorry but as you well know language like that is not acceptable on the forum so I have removed it from your post 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asperity Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 He is completely correct though 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 I have said this before but here goes again, I'm a relative 'newbie' and this forum took a lot of getting used to, there are some forum members who's topics or replies are intended to impress or offend and with the odd exception I have learned to either ignore or tolerate them, obviously in this instance obs has posted something that has offended or annoyed Fatshaft resulting in his angry and emotional response, personally I don't find obs's latest remarks much different than the rest of the drivel that has been posted on this particular topic that has as usual descended into a tirade of slanging and point scoring, the whole meaning of the original post has been completely lost in the fracas, for goodness sake get a grip on yourselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt Kije Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 Tough but true algy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgusted Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 God was not on your side tonight PJ Â Fatshaft... while clearly Obs comment rattled you (and I am not saying it shouldn't have) I'm sorry but as you well know language like that is not acceptable on the forum so I have removed it from your post Ddin't rattle me at all actually Dizzy. What my comments attempted to relay were my complete and utter astonishment that he can actually be as big an <??>hole as he appears to be from his 32,000 posts on here. Â The two posts quoted, especially the first, seem to confirm it. There's no doubt now, either he is a not right, or does it for sh**s and giggles, either way, surely despite the value he adds to your site through google rankings, enough is enough, and he simply has to be extinguished? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asperity Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 You have to admit though Algy that Obs' post was offensive and pig ignorant. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 You have to admit though Algy that Obs' post was offensive and pig ignorant. Â Asp I haven't a clue as I haven't generally been following the topic as I became bored with the repetitive replies a while back, I was just scrolling through before hitting the sack and spotted Fatshafts reply, what I said is what I feel so good night all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgusted Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 God was not on your side tonight PJ Â Fatshaft... while clearly Obs comment rattled you (and I am not saying it shouldn't have) I'm sorry but as you well know language like that is not acceptable on the forum so I have removed it from your post oh yes, I know "language" like that isn't acceptable, opinions like observer's appear to be fine though? I think that says an awful lot more about you than it does about me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 So opinions arn't valid unless they're yours then - if you have a problem with them, just ignore them; at least I try not to stoop to hysterical name calling? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgusted Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 So opinions arn't valid unless they're yours then - if you have a problem with them, just ignore them; at least I try not to stoop to hysterical name calling? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted November 3, 2012 Report Share Posted November 3, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter T Posted November 4, 2012 Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 Re the compo, could be that the Beeb aka license payees could be forking out compensation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted November 4, 2012 Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 Unfortunately we have to accept that Observer is regarded as a star of the forum and is therefore a protected species, he is persistent and consistent with his disgusting take on life yet survives unmolested while others who take him to task get their replies butchered. Â Can we hire a moderator, just one will do, who will have the guts to treat him as he deserves to be treated; if this doesn't happen then this forum will end up as a barren wasteland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted November 4, 2012 Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 Observer is not protected and the ones that have recently taken him to task only got their replies 'butchered' (as you put it) because of using FOUL and offensive language and emoticons which is against forum rules... like you well know Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted November 4, 2012 Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 He insinuates that child victims of this abuse will be backdated prostitutes if they receive compensation. Now instead of worrying about the odd incident of 'language' you should be debating the length of the disgusting gobbin's ban. That is moderation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted November 4, 2012 Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 I had missed obs's controversial post regarding the victims expected compensation, I think it must have been removed, however I did read the quote posted on fatshafts reply and I think obs's statement was to say the least silly and misguided, any victim awarded any recompense or compensation would have been rendered for the physical and mental anguish, assault and trauma experienced/suffered at the hands of this creature who used his influence and position to prey on the young and disabled, under no circumstances could the monies rewarded be construed as payment for services rendered, and to intimate as such is disgusting and certainly not to be made light of, obs I think you have made an idiot of yourself with this one and overstepped the mark of moral decency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted November 4, 2012 Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 I couldn't/cant delete his comment Eagle as so many people posted after it (and about it) that I'd have had to remove the majority of other people's posts too which would mean I'd pretty much denied everyone their 'voice' and opinion and that would not have gone down well would it ! Â Now is there any chance that this topic can now go back to what it is about rather than what you perceive to be my failings as a moderator. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tara_dad Posted November 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 I see a bit more was disclosed on the key gate as I call it to Broadmoor and old boy net work as in you do something for me I will do something for you . As too Leeds General Infirmary, Stoke Mandeville makes interesting reading. How can genuine good people who want to help in things like this now go about wanting to help knowing that everyone will be looking at the facts on why do you want to help do you have other motives  read the story here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted November 4, 2012 Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 I couldn't/cant delete his comment Eagle as so many people posted after it (and about it) that I'd have had to remove the majority of other people's posts too which would mean I'd pretty much denied everyone their 'voice' and opinion and that would not have gone down well would it !  Now is there any chance that this topic can now go back to what it is about rather than what you perceive to be my failings as a moderator. Thanks   No ban then, warning or quiet word? Thought not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tara_dad Posted November 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 Came upon this what do you all think I did not know this till research it   There is no legal obligation to pass on reports of abuse - even a head teacher can know that s pupil has been sexual assaulted in any way or from even by a member of staff or anybody and he or she has no legal obligation to report anything to anybody. And this can be in any professional job dealing with children in authoritie  On doing the research I found this got it from page 3 of the NSPCC fact sheet An introduction to child protection legislation in the UK,  which states the following.Whilst local authorities have a mandatory duty to investigate if they are informed a child may be at risk, there are no specific mandatory child abuse reporting laws in the UK that require professionals to report their suspicions to the authorities.  sould this be closed or left open you deeside or debate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgusted Posted November 4, 2012 Report Share Posted November 4, 2012 No ban then, warning or quiet word? Thought not. Nope, just let the forum bigot keep on spewing his vile opinions. Â I had a long PM made out to Dizzy on that very subject, but seems his inbox is full, so wouldn't send. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.