observer Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 A young single bloke engaging in a bit of debauchery - what's the problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 A young single bloke engaging in a bit of debauchery - what's the problem? Not a problem for me!, good luck to the lad is what I say, most of the negative comment are usually from anti-royals anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 An obvious embarrassment to the Royal family and the Queen in particular, otherwise, why all the effort to keep it out of the papers? Personally, I think he's just a bit of an immature prat, if he thought for one moment that none of his antics would get out to the public at some point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil Sid Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 Actually I don't think they tried to keep it out off the papers just the papers being very cautious on what they print in view of recent events on hacking. Â As for his private bits no longer being private, big whoop. So he has got dangly bits. on the plus side it may just enhance his chance of getting a bride (or not as the case may be) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cleopatra Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 His crown jewels were not on show because was covering them with is hands and his rear end had a red star on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 Â As for his private bits no longer being private, big whoop. So he has got dangly bits. on the plus side it may just enhance his chance of getting a bride (or not as the case may be) Â Â It could help to prove who his father is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cleopatra Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 It could help to prove who his father is. Â Â Was there ever any doubt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 Well I remember a newspaper report stating, - The royal family forced the late Princess Diana to blood test her younger son, Prince Harry, to prove he was not the offspring of an affair with an army officer  Never did hear the result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter T Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 The fact that it merits a mention on here, is just as bad as the newspapers making something out of it. There again hardly surprising when you look at who posted the topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted August 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 It's called "news" Pierre, reported on TV etc - no one's forcing you to be interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 And boring news at that ..... Â So no one's trying to force people to be interested eh or to have to listen and read? Â That makes me laugh as although the UK 'press' etc have apparently been so 'good' about it they and the UK tv news reports still won't stop going on about it and dropping hints as to who's showing it, saying what and all the rest. Â Boring.... and they should just let it drop and stop going on about it and people would soon turn the other cheek as it would soon shrivel up and be forgotten about. Â Zzzzzzzzzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cleopatra Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 Boring.... and they should just let it drop and stop going on about it and people would soon turn the other cheek as it would soon shrivel up and be forgotten about. Zzzzzzzzzz  It would soon shrivel up and be forgotten about? You don't mean Harry's willy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cleopatra Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 Looks around Phew! It's ok Hamada is engrossed in reading his book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 Are you sure that's what Hamada is doing Cleo as mobiles are easier to hide than desktops and laptops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 Seems that 'The Sun' will now publish the pictures, even though they admit that the Royal Family have asked them not to. Freedom of the press wins again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted August 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 It sells newspapers - so much for "no one being interested" - sad but true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie Posted August 24, 2012 Report Share Posted August 24, 2012 Only a matter of time before it's in all the Daily's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted August 24, 2012 Report Share Posted August 24, 2012 A snippet of the tv news said this morning the palace might sue the Sun now and there was mention of more pics and maybe a video being released ... I didn't hear any more as I couldn't be bothered to listen and they should all leave the lad alone. Â I briefly saw the picture on the front of the Sun in the shop ealier though (and NO I didn't go in specifically to look) and can't see what all the fuss is about or why people would buy a paper just for that. Â I bet Henry VIII and many other Royals have others far worse but luckily for them people didn't have mobiles with cameras on with them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted August 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2012 Indeed, throughout history "Royals" have had the time to indulge in debauchery, whilst their loyal peasants toiled the fields from dawn till dusk, with only the energy left to gossip about it! Catherine the Great of Russia (Queen of Slappers!); had a system of hydraulic lifts for table and food from a lower floor, to her private apartments in the petite Hermitage - just so "the servants" wouldn't witness anything! Perhaps in Harry's case, one should ask why the Royal Protection Squad didn't protect his privacy, by confiscating any mobile phone at the party? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil Sid Posted August 24, 2012 Report Share Posted August 24, 2012 I briefly saw the picture on the front of the Sun in the shop ealier though (and NO I didn't go in specifically to look) and can't see what all the fuss is about  I can lend you a magnifying glass if you want Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted August 24, 2012 Report Share Posted August 24, 2012 Â No need Evils as he had his hands covering his frontal bits anyway and you could only see his face, torso, hips and legs.... there was a young lady stood behind him but shielded from view too ......like I said no big deal. Â Actually thinking about as I type I do seem to have remembered quite a lot of detail considering it was just a very quick sidewards glance at the paper. Â Funny how the memory remembers certain things eh ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horace Posted August 25, 2012 Report Share Posted August 25, 2012 Well you can all make the predictable jokes, but it would seem none of you are particularly bothered about the incident. Personally, I DO deplore what has happened. Not the publication of the picture (although I have not see it and have no wish to) nor because I am anti-Royal. In fact I am very pro-Royal - which is why I deplore the behaviour of the prince. He should have learned by now the members of the Royal family can't do what the rest of us can do. Nightclubs and particularly nightclubs in Las Vegas should be out-of-bounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie Posted August 25, 2012 Report Share Posted August 25, 2012 Well thats blown algy's theory apart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted August 25, 2012 Report Share Posted August 25, 2012 Well thats blown algy's theory apart. Not for the first time Wolfie and I doubt it will be the last either! :grin: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted August 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2012 Think we have to decide just what "in the public interest" actually means? It's certainly not in my interest to see Harry starkers or to know which celeb is sleeping around. However, there must be some interest by a sad public, as it clearly sells newspapers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.