Bazj Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 Apparently this would be alleged terrorist has won the right to get his British passport back because it was ruled that as Egypt had already stripped him of his Egyptian one; he had to keep his UK one otherwise he would be "countryless" Amazing piece of British justice at its best! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 I don't have a passport and I'm not 'countryless' it just means I can't travel to or enter other countries etc. PS I am restraining myself from typing what I am really thinking and wanting to say in reply by the way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 Notice he got his British passport by marrying a British citizen. Hopefully the Yanks will extradite him, and he can then be supported by their tax-payers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazj Posted November 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 exactly.... we are still feeding him and paying thousands of pounds in benefits to his family and offspring.... Instead of making soldiers redundant they should send them after scum like Hamza Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 The Yanks alledge that he's had a hand in some serious terror plots - presume that must have been his right hand! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt Kije Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 I agree with Baz on this It's a shame the Egyptians got in first, In realising what a prat he is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Well, if the Yanks don't extradite him, we'll be paying his dole and HB, while he infects more young Muslim minds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue Durnim Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Am I missing something?.... ...we have gone to war to fight terrorists of all descriptions, sent thousands of military personnel to fight and die in the mountains and deserts in distant lands, costing billions of pounds to stop terrorism from coming to our shores, then we allow and import the very people who are inciting racial hatred, murder and atrocities on a national and global scale to thousands of innocent victims. No wonder he gave his right arm to marry a British citizen, so he could spout rubbish because the UK laws allow free speech, that many people in many wars have died for, so a man like Abu Hamza can encourage gullable people to commit mass murder, may be if the law was tougher, he would not have a leg to stand on either! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry hayes Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Just to play devil's advocate, isn't as well to have Hamza over here where we can keep an eye on him rather than having him covertly and actively planning in some middle east state. Happy days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue Durnim Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Just to play devil's advocate, isn't as well to have Hamza over here where we can keep an eye on him rather than having him covertly and actively planning in some middle east state. Happy days Simple answer, NO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazj Posted November 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Hamza would look soooo much better with a bullet between the eyes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Hamza is an example of why Bush and Blair's futile involvement in Afghanistan won't make us any safer. Rather than wasting our young men in Helmand, we should be tackling "the problem" way upstream. And "the problem" is, the radicalisation of young minds and the distortion of religious teaching in a non-regulated system, within a society that now panders to seperate development. The MET Police are trying to train Imams to counter these extremists and connect with youngsters in their flock, but many Muslim youngster don't speak Urdu and many Imams (imported from Pakistan) don't speak adequate English. The battle is (or should be), one of ideas; and far from encouraging "multi-culturalism" with "faith" schools; we should be promoting a single common cultural identity through secular education. Radicalism should be challenged at every opportunity, by rational debate. It's believed that "British" Muslims are now serving in Al Queda units in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen; these are home grown terrorists, and provide ideal suicide fodder for operations in the UK; but whilst they may receive military training abroad, their minds are being brainwashed in the UK, and ultimately the outcomes of all this will be on the streets of the UK . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.