inky pete Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Since the powers that be seem set on only allowing Greater Manchester residents to vote on these proposals, despite the undeniable fact that residents of other areas will also be affected, this could be the only chance we get to have a say. http://www.gmfuturetransport.co.uk/consultation/response/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Are the residents inside Manchester all members of ZANU PF?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted July 12, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 12, 2008 Maybe they've all got really tiny cars. Coz apparently, everyone who lives within the M60 can drive around wherever they want all day long without causing any congestion at all. (Thinks: What percentage of GM residents live within the M60? and they're the ones who'll benefit most from the public transport investment, so how many automatic "yes" votes is that?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted July 12, 2008 Report Share Posted July 12, 2008 Democracy is based on the self interest of each voter! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted July 12, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 12, 2008 Always has been. But when only some of those with a legitimate interest are offered a vote it ceases to be democracy. To dress this farce up as a democratic process is dishonest and an insult to our intelligence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahl Posted July 12, 2008 Report Share Posted July 12, 2008 it is all a confidence trick created by a government devoid of useful policies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted July 12, 2008 Report Share Posted July 12, 2008 Just another revenue earner! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted July 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 13, 2008 I agree with that! The proposed improvements to the public transport network are pretty much all necessary, and long overdue. There's also a desperate need for some road network infrastructure investment to address some of the existing motorway bottlenecks. My arguement is that the regions motorists have a right to expect these things to be funded without further charging, because they've already paid for them many times over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBain Posted July 14, 2008 Report Share Posted July 14, 2008 I see the Police are investigating the activities of Peel Holdings in relation to the congestion charge. Sounds to me like a case of sour grapes by the bloke who lost his seat in the local elections, but you never know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgusted Posted July 14, 2008 Report Share Posted July 14, 2008 I see the Police are investigating the activities of Peel Holdings in relation to the congestion charge. Sounds to me like a case of sour grapes by the bloke who lost his seat in the local elections, but you never know.Investigating in what way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahl Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 i believe that, as the trafford centre is within the proposed charge area, all visitors would have to pay. This would obviously affect Peel in the pocket. so get rid of the congestion charge and let motorists visit the free parking at trafford centre. e Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Kennedy Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 I see the Police are investigating the activities of Peel Holdings in relation to the congestion charge. Sounds to me like a case of sour grapes by the bloke who lost his seat in the local elections, but you never know. Pleasing to note that there is no more serious crime in Manchester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdrianR Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 This charge doesnt add up financially. The aim is to reduce congestion by 15% but raise ?175m p.a. in doing so to pay the loan off. Interestignly with the current state of fuel costs, congestion is actually dropping. So at thsi rate by 2013, the 15% will be gone anyway but Manchester tax payers will be committed to paying back the loan as all (i.e. most i.e. 80% - any takers for this beign 50% by 2013!) will have been done. Apparently add ?250 p.a. to every council tax bill if they dont get enoguh back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBain Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Police are reviewing whether there could have been any breach of the Representation of the People Act by Peel. Personally I think it's all rubbish, but there you go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 It's going nowhere, just sour grapes by a deposed politician. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoffrey Settle Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 It's a pity that Peel Holdings can't implement a system where they refund the congestion charge. This could be simular to the Cherry Tree in Culcheth who refund your parking charge if you eat in their pub. You get the parking fee knocked off your bill when you pay. Surely the new congestion computer, that takes a note of your registration plate as you cross over the boundary, could recognise your purchase via a smart card when you pay via a Trafford till and deduct the charge. Hold on there is a conflict here. Wouldn't it be better to spend your money in Warrington Town Perhaps if you were refunded the price of your bus/rail fair to the town centre then maybe things would even themselves out. It would also encourage people to reduce their carbon emmissions into the bargain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahl Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 this means you expect Peel to pay the congestion charge just to encourage shoppers? Better just scrap the idea and fund the transport from the mp slush funds and from the cancellation of the id card system that is bound not to work. Could even take money by cancelling the olympics now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Kennedy Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Just another revenue earner! But based on the London experience, the "earners" are the companies who manage the scheme, little actually goes on improving public transport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Alas the joys of "outsourcing", as we now know from exam marking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyMac Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 i believe that, as the trafford centre is within the proposed charge area, all visitors would have to pay. This would obviously affect Peel in the pocket. The Trafford Centre is one of the main causes of congestion in the area, so I fail to see why they should be exempt from the congestion charge! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted July 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 The congestion charge would have no effect on the traffic around the Trafford Centre, since the charge would only be levied on weekdays, inbound from 07:00 to 09:30 and outbound from 16:30 to 19:00. Most shoppers don't travel within the proposed charging periods. Trafford Centre staff however, most of whom are already earning fairly low wages, would be hit hard as they don't have a choice about what time they arrive at work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyMac Posted July 20, 2008 Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 Trafford Centre staff however, most of whom are already earning fairly low wages, would be hit hard as they don't have a choice about what time they arrive at work. Not necessarily - depends where the workers there live. Irlam and Worsley - yes. Salford and Stretford - no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted July 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2008 But those coming from outside the M60 are precisely the ones most likely to be driving. Salford, Stretford and other areas inside the M60 are already well served for bus links to the Trafford Centre - and the public transport options within the outer zone will only get better with all the money being spent there. It is currently all but impossible to commute by public transport to the Trafford Centre, or indeed any of the Trafford Park employment area, from many places outside the M60 - and there's nothing in the proposals which will make it any easier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.