Dizzy Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 Wonder how much we will get paid Not a bad idea though... is it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 The Tories trying to do "localism" is a bit like a ballet dancer trying to play rugby: this idea that folk (assuming they had the time or interest) will start up their own schools, pubs and post offices is merely a clique's charter, plucked desperately out of the thin air of gimmicks and destined to produce an even bigger dog's breaksfast of social segregation and anarchy than the new Labour gimmicks. The irony is; with a general weariness with new Labour, all the Tories needed to do was reproduce the electoral campaign of Michael Howard - in order to win this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 From the party that once said "there is no such thing as society" now comes the "we are all one big society" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 and as the saying goes: one volunteer is worth ten paid employees! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter T Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 And WBC are relying on the Third Sector to replace them in the cutbacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 It's the perfect solution from a councils point of view. If the services provided by the volunteers are excellent then the council gets to take the credit for organising it, if it all goes horribly wrong then you'll see a massive display of hand wringing, shoulder sloping and holding at arms length. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 It's the social equivelent of "every man for himself", let's take education as an example, fractured and stratified as it already is; parent not satisfied with little Jonny's progress at school (irrespective of how thick or disruptive little Jonny may be!); gathers a clique around her to start a new school; then when that clique fall out or get fed up of the time and energy required to deal with all the red tape; other cliques form to start another new school, and so on; until eventually, they'll all be teaching their own kids at home! Far from "back to basics", this is back to the 19th century! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.