Mary Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 The Prime Minister has declared that the decision to question Damian Green and search his home and offices was "a matter for the police" and of which he had no prior knowledge. But amid mounting anger and disquiet at Westminster over the action, taken in relation to alleged leaks of sensitive Home Office material, Mr Cameron said the PM had a duty to speak out. Writing in the News of the World, he said: "When it comes to vigorous opposition, if this approach had been in place in the 1990s, then Gordon Brown would have spent most of his time under arrest. "He made his career from passing on Whitehall leaks. And he'll be guilty of hypocrisy if he doesn't speak out," he said, - insisting the arrest was "not about our national security but government embarrassment". He wrote: "The Prime Minister has simply repeated that he 'had no prior knowledge' and this is 'a police matter'. Frankly, that's not good enough. "The question is: does he think it is right for an MP who has apparently done nothing to breach our national security - and everything to inform the public of information they're entitled to know - to have his home and office searched by a dozen counter-terrorist police officers, his phone, Blackberry and computers confiscated, and to be arrested and held for nine hours?" Mr Cameron also turned his fire on the Commons authorities for apparently "not thinking twice" about allowing officers to raid his immigration spokesman's office in Parliament. Speaker Michael Martin has faced calls for his resignation over the matter but his office would only say that "there is a process to be followed and that was followed" but the Home Office confirmed permission would have been required from the House authorities. While not criticising the present Speaker directly, Mr Cameron pointed to the example of his 17th century predecessor William Lenthall, who famously refused to give up MPs to King Charles I when he entered the Commons to have them arrested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 While not criticising the present Speaker directly, Mr Cameron pointed to the example of his 17th century predecessor William Lenthall, who famously refused to give up MPs to King Charles I when he entered the Commons to have them arrested. I wouldn't have called it a famous refusal to go down on your knees and beg and basically put the onus on the House to direct him. But similarities with the present speaker in the way that he was treated with little respect, and was unable to control proceedings do exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Kennedy Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 Seems as though they are hatching a plot to save Speaker Martin....until such times as a replacement can be found and Speaker Martin becomes Lord Mick of the Gorbals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 " oh what a tangled web they weave"! Noticed Jackie Smith being very carefull as to how she replied to journalist questioning, the eyes and body language said it all, there's a lot more to come out on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.