Peter T Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 The article on the news page seems to be an accident waiting to happen. Why is big always seen as better? By their own admission, both areas are short-handed, and to join the two together will create less efficiency than they have now. It doesn't make a lot of sense. They also hasten to add that it is not a cost-saving exercise and could even cost more money. WHY do it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgusted Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.