observer Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 Is it the buisiness of the Press to alert public attention to an "allegation" or should they confine their sensationalist reporting to courts and "convictions"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 We had this one recently:- http://www.warrington-worldwide.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12437&highlight= I stated then that I believe that an accused shouldn't be identified until they've actually been convicted of something. Anything else is trial by media. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted September 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 seems a certain local rag didn't pay attention to the item! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Not seen the item in question...... .....on account of me being on a different continent at the moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.