Tracey Bennett Posted March 26, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 That's great, thanks Algy. They don't look concrete do they?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peridot1 Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Yes the photographs are of WW2 vessels of which many were built again due to steel shortages and the speed with which they could be built. None were built at Fidler's Ferry so I don't know much about them as there isn't a Penketh connection. The MSC Company owned and operated a lot and they tended to be identified by numbers rather than names - all the WW1 vessels were named and pre - fixed "Crete". Construction of the WW1 vessels was of two types - concrete being poured into a monolithic mould to form the hull or the fabrication of ferro - concrete components individually which were then joined together. Work could not be carried on in very cold or frosty weather as the concrete would not take (wouldn't be much use at the moment lol). I do remember those boats on the Causeway and from a distance they did look like wood construction. They were behind Greenall's Brewery I think. Peridot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Peri, may be of interest to you. Although I believe your primary interest is focussed on Fiddler's Ferry this account is of the same company building at Preston. The Ritchie Unit System, ferro concrete shipbuilding, Fiddlers Ferry. Due to a shortage of steel during the first world war, several experiments were made in the construction of ferro-concrete ships. Land was leased from Preston Corporation by the company Hughes and Stirling. Four slipways were constructed adjacent to the bull nose on the south side of the river. Orders were placed by the shipping controller (London) for Ten 700 ton engineless barges. These barges were much in demand for bringing iron ore to Britain from Spain. The method of construction adopted was the 'Ritchie Unit System' of pre cast sections assembled on the slipways. The first ship completed was the 'Cretemanor' (PD110) launched in September 1919. The second ship to make her way down the stocks was the 'Cretemoor' (PD 112) launched one year later in December 1920. Work was started but never finished on two further unnamed vessels. After the cessation of hostilities the scheme was abandoned and the yard fell into disuse. Cretemanor was transferred to the London board of trade and then on to Crete shipping Co (UK) She was sold to Spain in 1927 then sunk in harbor construction. Cretemoor struck a submerged object while under tow between Newcastle and Dunkirk. She was also being towed by a concrete tug (the Creteboom) and now lies on the bottom just off Dunkirk. For a short period after Hughes and Stilring moved off the site, the facilities were taken over by Ritchie Concrete Engineering and Shipbuilding Company. They then succesfully launched a small coater 'Burscough' which ended it's days as a foundation for a jetty in the Isle of Man. The chapter was not yet closed on concrete ship contruction at Preston. A small firm Steelcrete Marine Ltd. set up operations just inland from the old slipways in 1970 to produce specialized leasurecraft such as yachts and canal cruisers. The smooth hulls of several abandoned craft could still be seen amongst the weeds in the early 80's For many years after the main slipways had been abandoned the frames of the two unfinished H&S vessels lay on the stocks but were eventually demolished in the mid 60's. No trace remains today of this enterprise other than a few bricks and the odd bit of concrete on the banks. Dimensions of Cretemanor & Cretemoor: 747grt 712 nrt / 54.86m x 9.58m x 5.79mCancelled orders: PD 111, 113, 114,115, 116, 117, 118, 119. 1939 Map of boat building slips at FF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy51 Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Algy is there anything known about the strength & durability of concrete hulls as opposed to steel when used in ship construction ,particularly the type in your picture of the coaster ? Were they really seagoing compared to steel hulls ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peridot1 Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 I don't know the physics of the strength of the hulls Davy but some of the WW1 vessels ventured as far as the Baltic and were classed 100+A1 at Lloyds. I think the Baltic was only allowed in the Summer months but I believe they were as durable as steel and did not suffer from rusting until there was wear on the outer concrete encasing the iron framework and then obviously that would begin to rust when it was exposed. See concreteships.org Peridot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peridot1 Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Very interesting thanks Algy and it is a copy of the booklet you have posted that I am trying to get hold of. Peridot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Algy is there anything known about the strength & durability of concrete hulls as opposed to steel when used in ship construction ,particularly the type in your picture of the coaster ? Were they really seagoing compared to steel hulls ? Great strength and would stand up to the odd knock with the dockside but wouldn't stand up to head on impact, they made a narrowboat in concrete but had to scrap it as the repeated banging against lock sills resulted in serious damage to the bow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracey Bennett Posted March 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 I've only just noticed on the photo of the launch of the Santa Rosa, there are dozens of people clinging on to the deck as it launches! I guess health and safety hadn't been invented yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 I've only just noticed on the photo of the launch of the Santa Rosa, there are dozens of people clinging on to the deck as it launches! I guess health and safety hadn't been invented yet. They are all lying down on the starboard side away from the water to counterbalance the hull and prevent it rolling over and possibly sinking.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeborn John Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 I'm struggling to place the location of the Santa Rosa launch, my best guess is that the picture was taken from the lifting bridge over the canal with the photographers back to the Sloop pub. And that is just a guess... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 I'm struggling to place the location of the Santa Rosa launch, my best guess is that the picture was taken from the lifting bridge over the canal with the photographers back to the Sloop pub.And that is just a guess... This map will illustrate where they launched thie boats FJ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracey Bennett Posted March 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 They are all lying down on the starboard side away from the water to counterbalance the hull and prevent it rolling over and possibly sinking.. But they still have to cling on for dear life! What if they accidentally let go? Or turn out not to be heavy enough and the ship rolls over? Thanks for the map too, I was struggling to imagine where the yard was in relation to the Sloop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
algy Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 But they still have to cling on for dear life! What if they accidentally let go? Or turn out not to be heavy enough and the ship rolls over? Thanks for the map too, I was struggling to imagine where the yard was in relation to the Sloop. It's all worked out previously to the nearest body, Trace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeborn John Posted March 27, 2013 Report Share Posted March 27, 2013 Your map has set me right Algy, thank you. Folk were certainly a different breed back then, imagine the hullabaloo if people had been aboard a launch like that nowadays, half of them would have been off next day claiming whip lash! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorothy Humphries Posted October 13, 2021 Report Share Posted October 13, 2021 Hi Just 'googling' and came across this link to concrete ships built at Fiddlers Ferry. peridot1 and Tracey Bennett Did you find all the information that you were looking for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.