Peter T 62 Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 Unless there were third party witnesses, DNA or other "evidence" - these situations remain one persons word against another. Criminal prosecutions carry the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In the case of a defendant corpse, the trial would tend to be rather one sided ! Unless there were third party witnesses, DNA or other "evidence" - these situations remain one persons word against another. Criminal prosecutions carry the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In the case of a defendant corpse, the trial would tend to be rather one sided ! So how can someone be guilty of murder in the absence of a body? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
asperity 958 Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 He did say 'either way' maybe paedos react differently to witches. Are you Obs' bodyguard Robbo? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
algy 386 Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 Are you Obs' bodyguard Robbo? Footman!, asp. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wolfie 299 Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 Are you Obs' bodyguard Robbo? I thought he was mine.!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
algy 386 Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 I thought he was mine.!!! Dont fret Wolfie, Robbo's a learner compared to you, no finesse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
observer 624 Posted May 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 Peter, the clue was in the words "these situations" & "evidence". Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nick Tessla 28 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 The beeb has reported this stuoid remark "A prominent barrister specialising in reproductive rights has called for the age of consent to be lowered to 13. Barbara Hewson told online magazine Spiked that the move was necessary in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal to end the "persecution of old men"..." Why not do away with the whole concept of consent as well , Babs, then all the rapists can carry on without the risk of "persecution". Quote Link to post Share on other sites
observer 624 Posted May 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 lock up your prams. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lt Kije 99 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bazj 503 Posted May 14, 2013 Report Share Posted May 14, 2013 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
asperity 958 Posted May 14, 2013 Report Share Posted May 14, 2013 And in full view of millions of children! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bazj 503 Posted May 14, 2013 Report Share Posted May 14, 2013 izzy wizzy; let's get busy!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Cleopatra 93 Posted May 14, 2013 Report Share Posted May 14, 2013 Soo has not made any complaint? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
observer 624 Posted May 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2013 They tried to sweep it under the carpet! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
algy 386 Posted May 15, 2013 Report Share Posted May 15, 2013 More cases of abuse come to light, Emu, Spitt the dog and Orville have all made accusations of sexual abuse. Keith Harris is reported to have said " I never new Orville had it in him". Emu has been quoted as saying "Rod by name and Rod by nature", he may face countercharges of pushing Rod off the roof!. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dizzy 411 Posted May 15, 2013 Report Share Posted May 15, 2013 You've started something now Baz Quote Link to post Share on other sites
observer 624 Posted May 15, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 15, 2013 Carefull, the Press may start taking these latest revelations seriously ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.