Jump to content

Americans and EU


Lt Kije

Recommended Posts

Lt Kije, your "evidence" consists solely of the opinion of one pro EU blogger. Not at all convincing. If there was no advantage to being in the EEA and outside the EU then why on earth would Norway not become full members of the EU. Perhaps they have more control of their politicians than we have, this is certainly the case in Switzerland!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lt Kije, the little snippet below is taken from a report by the EEA Joint Parliamentary Committee of 27/11/12 and concerns some proposed EU regulation of the offshore oil industry:

 

EEA20007-oil.jpg

 

The Norwegians don't like it (because of the costs involved) so they are not going to accept it. Simple. The UK, on the other hand, will have to accept it whether they like it or not. And don't forget that most of the countries in the EU don't have an offshore oil industry so won't be affected by any regulations that they put in place!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The writer of the article, Matts Persson is a well known Europhile who wants to stay in the EU, albeit with some changes to the setup which won't happen in a month of Sundays. But being able to remove ourselves from the daylight robbery of the CAP and CFP like Norway would be a boost for Britain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should imagine the terms would have to be negotiated rather than just accepted, but Cameron doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of renogotiating our terms of imprisonment while we're still members of the EUSSR whatever he likes to claim to the contrary. There is a way out and that is article 50 of the Lisbon treaty (you know, that one Brown signed when he thought everyone had gone home and weren't looking).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted against joining the "common market" at the last referendum, now it's a "European Union" - all done without a vote by the Plebs. So I'd be wary of joining anything in the future, unless it was clearly in OUR National interest, and subject to regular ratification/rejection by "the people"..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And another example of how we would be better off out of the EUSSR: We have a successful motor manufacturing industry with a large amount of exports. Regulations for international motor vehicle standards are decided by the  UNECE World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations which has 57 signatories including Norway. As only the EU Commission can legislate on trade matters, not individual members of the EU, the UK has no independent say in the regulation of standards for motor vehicle manufacturing. Norway, on the other hand, while not having a car industry to speak of, does have a say in such regulation.

 

Better off out? You bet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point, Lt Kije, is that the working time directive is just the EU implementation of worldwide regulations drawn up internationally, and Norway has had a say in the drawing up of these international regulations whereas the UK hasn't because we are stuck in the EU and only have a small influence in what is being drawn up. In other words Norway, by not being part of the EU, has more say in the drawing up of the regulations that rule our lives than we do ourselves. Norway can also not implement parts of regulations they don't like but we cannot.  And for this we pay the EUSSR? Better off out by far!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try comparing the pros and cons between existing members of the EU.  Bulgaria for example, where life is so good, that later this year, a sunami of economic refugees will be heading for the UK , looking for work or our benefits system.  These dependent Countries rely on net handouts from Brussels, paid for by the net payments of the N/Europeans (incl the UK).  We a paying to bring their economic infrastructure into the 21st century, while our own is neglected through lack of cash. That's the basis of the EU. Then you can discuss the millions being wasted on the EU budget, and the absurdities of the EU Parliament moving from Brussels to Strasbourg, and back every month etc etc.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The UK did have a say in the working time directive, it opted out of some of it Asp. Or had you forgot. Norway could not.

 

The UK did have a say in the working time directive, it opted out of some of it Asp. Or had you forgot. Norway could not.

Don't know about opting out. Because of the working week being greater in cases of 12/15 hour shifts, they found a way around the wording. Pity they couldn't strive to do the same with the rest of the stuff from the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...