observer Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 A US mother who has been giving botox treatment to her 8 yo daughter, has had the child taken into care - time for a parenting exam? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 No, just adoption followed immediately by permanent sterilisation. It's the only way to prevent evolution going backwards! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 No... but maybe time for forced sterilisation and maybe a prison sentence or better still the birch (leavig awful scars of course) in this stupid womans case. These idiotic and self centered parents who become obsessed with kids pageants and the likes are sickening. Not only in the US but there's also many in the UK too. I saw a programme where youngsters of the same age and even younger were put on sunbeds or given fake tans, made to wear false lashes, makeup and even padded bra's, skimpy dresses and high heels just to look the part. They weren't even allowed to play out incase they bruised or cut themselves as that would severely detract from the 'look' the stupid bloody mothers wanted for them. To me it's just another form of child cruelty and should NOT be allowed. A parentling course would not stop the likes of her or the many others like them Obs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted May 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 OK, I'll go with Inky's proposition! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 Ooops Inky's post wasn't there when I was typing my reply..... Inky... do you mean that the child should be sterilised or the parent... or both Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted May 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2011 Given the number of teenage pregnancies - perhaps both?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted May 18, 2011 Report Share Posted May 18, 2011 Definitely the parent - but if the daughter has inherited the mothers "stupid" gene then maybe both wouldn't be such a bad idea! An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure, after all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted May 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 On that basis, we could solve the over population problem within a generation! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inky pete Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 Disease and the risks of daily life used to do that job for us - as well as encouraging the "survival of the fittest". Modern medicine, the welfare state and 'elf 'an safety appear to have stopped the process! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted May 19, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 Problem is Ink, that those with the "idiot" gene, often kill someone else rather than getting killed - like the woman who came out in front of me today, who obviously was clueless on how to use a mini island. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.