Jump to content

Why the change?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No Wolfie - they had ways of making you walk- as the said abstract act was used often for cycling offences.


Perhaps a cyclist refused his name and address, you changed tack and suggested he may have stolen the bike, a much more serious offence, which achieved a good and proper result. So perhaps Wolfie was right in the first place.


Happy days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got booked by the police for riding my bike on along the pavement on Grappenhall Road on a Sunday morning when I was in my early teens... they even said the 'anything you may say will be taken down and used' statement :shock:


I gave them my name and address and I wont go into what happened when the police called round to speak to my parents :oops::lol:


I hope it wasn't you Harry... if so I appologise many years dwn the line for my mums outburst :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...