Jump to content

Dave's toy box!


observer

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

So, IF the UN intention was to "protect civilians", perhaps boots on the ground in Libya would have been preferable, requiring only a corridor establishing between the two sides to physically keep them apart. However, as is becoming anundantly clear, the real objective is "regime change", with NATO now acting as the rebel airforce and talk of arming "the rebels" (civilians) thus encouraging them to intensify combat and thus "civilian" deaths. Truth is, they've been gagging to get rid of Gadafi for years and have now siezed on this opportunity - it would be more honest for Hague and Co to just admit it, and quit the hypocracy. :roll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A rebel is always a rebel Peter....:wink:

and who's to say they wont rebel against the next person, or the next.

 

Do you really think they will stop when they take over his home town though and not forgetting that Gadaffi's supporters will probably never really 'stop' either :?

 

As hard as it is to believe he does actually have a lot of supporters.. and they are all willing to fight and die for him just as those against him will too.

 

I doubt either side will ever trully STOP :cry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of Gadboys supporters are brainwashed or scared of repercussions. You only have to study the faces of the orchestrated demo's to see that. Read an article a couple of weeks ago, when one of his soldiers got captured due to injury and hadn't been aware of what was going on, because as soldiers they weren't allowed access to outside information. True or not, time will tell. But the soldiers seem to be deserting to the rebels rather than the other way round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, don't think so - Saudi has oil, is currently repressing it's people, and not a squeak out of Cameron and Co - think it's called double standards. :wink:

 

Nah. Saudi like the West and spend a couple of quid buying arms which supports the economy. Digressions can be overlooked when brown envelopes abound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somethings are patently clear: If left to themselves, Gadafi would have reasserted his power by now, rebel leaders would be executed or have fled to the EU (probably to their colony in Manchester!) and we would adapt to probably paying more for his oil and/or suffering more Lockabies. If we comply with the spirit of the UN resolution, we can probably even things up a little, make the whole thing last longer and possibly contribute to an increase in collateral damage; and hope Gadafi's followers are not family and tribal friends, but will turn on him. As I said - outcomes in war are less predictable than in any other enterprise. :?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...