CP Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 I dont believe for one minute that Brett Hodgson could not have played in the two games coming up against warrington. They have obviously pulled him out as they know that the wire fans will have a field day singing his name ala Ryan Atkins last season. I would love to know who leaked this story, was it wire in the hope of causing maximum disruption to huddersfield in the run up to the cup game or was it Hodgson because he was annoyed with huddersfield for not giving him the deal he wanted? The timing of all this is not just a coincidence thats for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teessidewire Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 They won't purposefully weaken their team. They've just lost Lunt, the Hooker for several weeks so they won't just leave Hodgson out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CP Posted April 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 Hmmmm. Who will be replacing Lunt? Someone who is arguably one of the main dangers and always seems to have a good game against warrington. Hodgson has been pulled due to the recent revelations, if he played and had a poor game the huddersfield would be accusing him of all sorts. In reality there is no way he could play against warrington for the remainder of this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wirewire Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 I can't see them "resting" any players - they will play their strongest team they can in every game - they are still in the mix in Superleague and will want to avenge last years final defeat. Either way, we'll still beat them.................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy51 Posted May 1, 2010 Report Share Posted May 1, 2010 Hodgsons signing was actually stated in last Saturday's Daily Express. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 2, 2010 Report Share Posted May 2, 2010 warrington have just rested higham ,king ,wood ,so whats diff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teessidewire Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 The difference was that we won 68-16 and Hudds lost. Hodgson was injured, that's why he didn't play, no other reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfette Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Most of the teams rested players including Warrington, is this disrespectful to the Magic weekend concept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CP Posted May 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 It certainly seems like a fair few teams used the 'magic' weekend to rest a few players before the important challenge cup games the following week. Priorities in the right order if you ask me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theinsider Posted May 11, 2010 Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 bet they wished they had left him out now - gifted warrington three tries! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.