Jump to content

How do WBC justify


Peter T
 Share

Recommended Posts

When political representation is viewed by most, as a job (a nice little earner), the earnings become the prime motivation rather than any concept of actively improving the wellbeing of the community. :roll: NB: The vote to accept 10% will be unanimous! :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even voting on this amount of increase feels like a kick in the teeth given the present economic climate most people have to endure. The recomendation should have been refused out of hand as it is,at best, overgenerous and more honestly stinks to high heaven of hypocricy. But it probably will be passed given that we can't get rid of them for 4 more years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When political representation is viewed by most, as a job (a nice little earner), the earnings become the prime motivation rather than any concept of actively improving the wellbeing of the community. :roll: NB: The vote to accept 10% will be unanimous! :wink:

 

Deja vu observer? Deja vu!!! :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So WE ALL get a near 5% increase again on our council tax bills and THEY now want a 10% increase on their pocket expenses :roll:

 

I moaned when the teachers went on strike over their 10% 'wish' but I take it all back. Give the teachers their 10% and deduct 10% from all council members to balance the books :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for you info Peter: Leaders don't decide these issues, they are vehicles of patronage for their immediate supporters, and if they don't deliver the patronage, their luitenants will quickly dispose of them. :shock: Politicians are like rats fighting in a bag; the only thing that contains them and sustains an aura of unity, is a collective self interest. :roll::wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's wait and see

 

Do you really think there is anything but the one answer Paul?

 

Under the freedom of information act.... can we request the details of who votes for and against this rise?

 

I believe a surprise awaits us next week. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that the vote is that important, especially if the overwhelming majority vote one way, for an individual or a small group to vote the other way can seem somewhat tokenistic. Much better that those who feel uneasy with the current scheme of allowances and expenses make a speech offering an alternative so that the rather unedifying spectacle of such matters being debated on an annual basis is resolved.

 

Is the term "blacksheep" still allowed in these so called PC times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just been looking in more detail at the "independent" proposals and note that the basic allowance is reduced by 10% to ?6,614 ( just realised and mortified that this is the annual rate, not the weekly rate :wink::D:D:D ) and in/de creases for those with added responsibilities range from -2.5% to + 235% which would give a year on year % increase of 9.8% all very odd how these figures have been arrived at, and I wouldn't have thought anybody will vote for them, so I doubt if there will be any black sheep....least of all me. I understand there were no increases last year, which of course would make any increases this year appear far greater than they are.

 

PS I note in Wigan the basic allowance is ?10,985. I can't understand why there isn't a set national rate and banded according to council size. :idea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you'll find some Councils up and down the Country have astronomical allowances (don't tell them at WBC!). :wink: As with all politicians, an independently advised national rate might be seen to be fairer OR a direct link with the rises of the lowest pay scale in their Authority, which may engender some realisation of the poor wage rates that exist. :roll::wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not really.

The result was probably because too many stood to take a drop and too few stood to make a significant gain.

 

The only positive being that the last time this happened, they ALL voted for a massive increase and it went through.

WHY they need an outside recommendation is hard to understand.

 

Maybe they should start earning their corn now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have an "independent" (I use the term very loosely!) outside panel, because Government rules say they must, but they don't have to abide by it's findings. :roll: Meanwhile, Parliament has no such "independent" panel; and their latest scam of setting up a committee, chaired by Speaker (wife spent ?4k on taxis for shopping trips) Martin; is rumoured to be recommending a lump sum payment of ?24,000pa for their second homes, regardless of how much they spend on them, thus no need for receipts and no possibility of public scrutiny. :roll: Clearly a license to print money - cos they can! :shock::twisted: Unfortunately, Democracy won't cure this disease, as they are the products of it. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...