Jump to content

Mass Debate ?


observer

Recommended Posts

As for Tony Benn, I prefer this quote 

 

"The flag of radicalism which has been hoisted in Wolverhampton is beginning to look like the one that fluttered 25 years ago over Dachau and Belsen"

 

Referring of course to the rantings of Enoch Powell ( recently cited by the church as a member of the Westminster Paedophile ring)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:  Nice effort, they used to call the SNP, "the tartan Tories" too !  The left in the Labour Party has been opposed to the EU, even when it was a "Common Market"; so nowt new there.  Now for those opposed to the EU, the ECHR and unmanaged immigration, there's only one Party left to vote for - so basically a default position from now on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not if you've worked out that the EU is the cause of our troubles, free movement of labour etc.  Don't know about the Scots having independence from us, it's us who need the independence from Brussels !  The LibLabCons won't give it us, so there's only one Party left !  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest problem is not who votes for who, but who doesn't vote. Voting should be made a legal requirement in this country as it is in Australia.... but of course the Westminster luvvies would never want that because virtually to a man, every one of them would have more people who didn't vote for them suddenly having to vote.... and a real protest vote would then kick in...

 

Incidentally it may interest all you voters out there to know that most Cheshire Labour MP's cost on average more than £1,200 per vote whereas most Cheshire Tory MP's cost £900 per vote based on how much they take from the state against how many people voted for them

 

Helen Jones cost us £967,334.00 in salary and expenses last year and yet she only managed to vote in 67% of the available polls and was ranked 463rd in voting efficiency.

 

David Mowatt cost us £887,370.00 in salary and expenses and voted in 85% of available commons polls and was ranked 64rd for his voting efficiency.... 400 places above Jones

 

So the answer is obviously clear.... the more Labour MP's that get voted in, the more they will screw the system and cost us more as a country

 

MEP's cost on average £1.80 million each and they don't even get to make the laws; they merely rubber stamp the nonsense invented by the unelected law makers that you or I cannot vote for.... democracy at its best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and how efficient are the Ukip MEPs Baz ?

 

I just knew you would come back with that one..... in fact I almost posted your exact point at the end of mine just to pre-empt it.... but I thought I'd give you the satisfaction of asking it.

 

They have a track record collectively of attending about 62% of votes.... comparable with our own Labour MP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to turn things won't work.... and yes I did vote tory last time round; as I have said I was brought up in Bewsey as you were but never in my life would I or have I voted Labour.

 

Just because you seemed to have morphed over the years into some eco-warrior is your decision. That is the right we have in this country; to be able to choose who we wish to vote for based on our own free will.... and to live our lives the way we wish to so crack on with the personal attacks and enjoy

 

My figures above show our Labour MP is costing us nearly 1million pounds a year and our tory one a bit less... that was my point... I'm not asking or pointing out any pros or cons for voting UKIP, I was pointing out what our MP's are currently costing us and also pointed out that on the whole it would be cheaper to vote Tory when it came to saving money from the public purse; facts facts facts.... I know you like quoting facts and statistics so you should be applauding the fact that I've done so too

 

... so please stop trying to turn everything onto the current target for your political anger.... oh and while we are on the subject of voting, you have told everyone on here who I voted for and may vote for.....exactly where do your voting intentions lie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baz I didn't know how you voted until you said, I could have guessed given the sycophantic Tory posts you made prior to the last election. Did Paul Kennedy take the breakup hard lol . I don't know how you will be voting this time as unlike you I am unable to read minds through postings on a forum.

I am no Eco warrior Baz, I hardly think knowing which rubbish to put where qualifies me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good question Baz, lots of liberal luvvie sniping at UKIP, but no promotion of his preferred brand.  This election has turned into a surreal bidding war, with the two main Parties promising  loads of spending, but not saying where the money is coming from; especially in the light of the need to balance the budget and pay off the deficit.  The Greens, SNP and Welsh Nats are queuing up to max out the national credit card; in denial of any austerity requirement to pay our debts or any clue as to where all the money is coming from.  Strangely, the only two with any semblance of real politic are the LibDums and UKIP; Clegg is trying to retain an aura of fiscal responsibility at least, still mentioning the deficit, but without any precise mention of the funding sources; while Farage has stated where the money is coming from. eg: saving our net contributions to the EU and the £billions in overseas aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farage is bricking it as he has already said its curtains for him if he doesn't win Thannet, and he is looking dicey, even covering up poor opinion polls.  I like that you don't like my snipes at UKIP, perhaps the unfortunate victims  who UKIP candidates snipe at don't much like them doing that.  What really gets me is this breath of fresh air crap.  They are a rotten to the core right wing bunch of former Tories .  I am delighted to see then plummeting in the polls and hope it continues.  Why should I tell anyone how I intend to vote?  Perhaps I don't feel strongly enough about any party to come on here and promote them or give them my endorsement.  You Observer, on the other hand, seem to flit from Party to party, dogma to dogma, lost cause to lost cause.  Remember CAP  the great hope for the future, makes me chortle that one.  I just cannot stand the bigots in UKIP and will continue to mock, deride and hopefully embarrass a few of its supporters, get over it.

 

209n5ms.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I live in an area that a donkey in a red rosette could win a seat..... my vote normally counts for nothing. 

 

The main point of my argument was to say that voting should be made a legal requirement. That way the keyboard warriors who constantly bark on about what Labour did and how nasty the tories are but then usually end their sentences with: "....and that's why I don't vote" can be accountable too....even if its a "None of the above" option.

 

I have changed my view on PR.... when it was first muted, the main parties were in receipt of most of the percentage of votes and so it was pretty pointless because according to all the polls, the majority of voters were happy with the 2 main parties. Now, things have changed and the 2 major parties are strugging to get 65% of the vote (and that is split almost 50-50) and so about 30-35% each in the polls but they can expect almost 300 seats each whereas the combined percentages of the "fringe" parties; SNP, UKIP, Green etc etc. will be lucky to get a few seats each (except in Scotland where SNP will wipe the floor with Labour according to most analysts) 

 

Maybe it is time to take the plunge and if 15% of the voters want a UKIP MP, then 15% of the MP's should be from UKIP....if 9% of the voters want a Lib Dem, then 9% of MP's should be Lib Dem and if 4% of the eco-luvvies want to be thrust back into the dark ages, then 4% of the MP's should be Green....

 

Surely our democracy should now be evolving to account for what the voter actually wants? in a constituency where say 46% vote Tory and 45% vote Labour.... those that vote Labour are just wasting their vote.....

 

and just to re-iterate, all of the Cheshire Labour MP's cost over £1,200 per vote cast for them and the Conservatives just over £900 per vote cast for them....would you pay that much to vote for Helen Jones or David Mowatt out of your own pocket? Because in a sense, that is exactly what you are doing :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we all know your views on UKIP PJ.... just gets a bit same old same old when all you keep doing is posting pictures from the Huffington Post..... I go on the site a lot....it is quite funny; but I wouldn't base my entire contrary argument on some 1960's kids TV show adapted to suit a certain agenda by some PC savvy lefty loons.... just look at the Hitler sketches from the film Der Untergang.... thousands of them out there loads used by political protesters from all sides.... It is funny but of absolutely no value whatsoever 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah  PR suits you now.  Pity you didn't forsee that when you had your chance at a referendum.  Just to clarify, an MPs voting is not their only duty.

 

Ah so I am not allowed to ever change my views.... so it isn't a democracy you want after all.....

 

being allowed to change our views is a part of that surely? Just like Woodward who was the Tory who defected to Labour in St Helens (along with his butler and chauffeur) or the Tory who defected to UKIP or the many many Labour MP's who all voted to back Tonys war in Iraq only to quickly distance themselves when it all went wrong?

 

I am allowed to change my views depending on the situation at the time. Otherwise we would only ever have a Labour or Tory government if no one ever decided to vote in different ways.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah so I am not allowed to ever change my views.... so it isn't a democracy you want after all.....

 

being allowed to change our views is a part of that surely? Just like Woodward who was the Tory who defected to Labour in St Helens (along with his butler and chauffeur) or the Tory who defected to UKIP or the many many Labour MP's who all voted to back Tonys war in Iraq only to quickly distance themselves when it all went wrong?

 

I am allowed to change my views depending on the situation at the time. Otherwise we would only ever have a Labour or Tory government if no one ever decided to vote in different ways.... 

Is it not one of your favourite gripes that the EU will make you have more than one referendum if it doesn't suit their agenda?  ok for you though :wink:  The chance for PR was voted on and soundly given a thumbs down by the UK people, there is your Democracy.  Just because it would serve Ukip better now instead of the Lib Dems is , I am afraid, tough titty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why whinge?  Obviously Kippers don't like it.  Suits me fine.  If its of no value don't worry

 

but you have done what you only ever do when it comes to political debate.... call everyone names like "Kippers" and such like but failed to answer any of the points I have made or questions I have asked.... 

 

You should be a politician mate; you have swerved around every point and question I have asked like a car on a skid pan; always having to get your anti-UKIP point across but never addressing anything I have said and then calling me names when I dare to disagree. 

 

I don't think it's democracy you seem to favour its totalitarianism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not one of your favourite gripes that the EU will make you have more than one referendum if it doesn't suit their agenda?  ok for you though :wink:  The chance for PR was voted on and soundly given a thumbs down by the UK people, there is your Democracy.  Just because it would serve Ukip better now instead of the Lib Dems is , I am afraid, tough titty.

 

 

Just like the chance for Scottish interdependence was voted on and defeated..... it won't stop Ed and Ed doing some grubby back room deal to allow another referendum on the proviso that the SNP will prop up a minority Labour Government. Unfortunately once the Scots go, Ed and his chums will condem us all to a lifetime of Tory Governments because the Labour lot will have lost their Scottish Seats and any chance of support from the SNP.... then they will have to change things; that's democracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...