Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
observer

What's the point?

Recommended Posts

What's the point of raking up allegations about Sir Jimmy Saville OBE - the guy's dead and can't defend his reputation; and is beyond any criminal retribution in any case? :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because thats what the Main Stream media do these days. Bring up irelevancies and ignore the difficult major issues. Just print things to sell papers, keep the masses entertained. Pathetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure the matter would have been raised by one or more of the girls concerned first and, IF the allegations be true, they should still have let sleeping dogs lie? Would you had it been one of yours, eh what?

I'm pretty sure that no-one in the media would have woke up one day and thought, 'Hummm... Jimmy Saville is dead. I'm going to dig and delve and hunt around for any information that would prove he was a perverted paedophile'.

He never married but dressed so camp they would be more likely to think let's find some evidence that he was gay and had sexual affairs with other men. :roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He never married but dressed so camp they would be more likely to think let's find some evidence that he was gay and had sexual affairs with other men. :roll:

 

It may well have started out that way :|

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly, but there were no records of these girls being abused to be unearthed. So, where did the accusations come from? The girls themselves. Did they conspire to accuse the man of abusing them? I doubt it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The girls involved have a right to be heard and believed so they can draw a line under it and move on with their lives. It appears that many people associated with the BBC knew something was going on at the time but did nothing, wanting to protect Mr Savile's 'reputation'. It has been confirmed that these girls were not connected but told the same or similar stories. Even those meant to be in charge of the victims at the approved school chose to keep it quiet because they feared losing the charity money. It really doesn't matter if the perpetrator is now dead, it is the abused who deserve to be heard now.

 

The cover-up at the time was wrong and similar cover-ups are still wrong. You only have to look at the the recent Rochdale cases where the victims were not believed and far too many people turned a blind eye to child abuse, preferring to blame the victims for 'lifestyle' choice. This should not happen and the common belief is that the same is going on in many more of our towns and cities.

 

As I remember it, if a child reports abuse of any description, they must be believed and the incident reported to the relevant official who should investigate the facts. Children are being let down by adults who are too politically correct and can't use their common sense. Where a child under 16 is involved, surely a criminal offence has been committed and should be investigated as such.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannot but agree with you entirely lady and any who say let sleeping dogs lie because the man is dead should hang their heads in shame.

Catholic or none catholic, faith or no faith, it really doesn't matter. It shouldn't happen.

I would ask that nobody make light of this subject because those girls would have suffered terribly, mentally and/or physically, and possibly still suffering. The people who knew it was happening should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves for covering it up and must be brought to justice for allowing it to continue.

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not making light of the subject, I'm having a pop at the late nonce, Jimmy Saville.

 

I agree with most of what you and SL said.

 

Oh, and this:

 

snn2501asutcliffe_740914a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IF there were "victims", it should have been reported at the time of the alleged offence - one alleged incident was reported, but the Police investigation appears to have been inconclusive - maybe he fixed it?! :roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IF there were "victims", it should have been reported at the time of the alleged offence - one alleged incident was reported, but the Police investigation appears to have been inconclusive - maybe he fixed it?! :roll:

 

If there were "victims" it should have been reported at the time, you say, then go on to say one alleged incident WAS reported. Then you make a whimsical remark like it was no great deal. Hummm.

These were children and as already reported were too afraid to tell anyone, and maybe too embarrassed, as is often the case with an abused child, and possibly thinking who would take their word against a well known, popular celebrity?. The fact that they did not report it does not mean it didn't happen.

Ok, consider this if just one child was abused by this man maybe people would doubt her, say she made it up, whatever. The fact is that several girls all unrelated and probably unknown to each other and living in different parts of the country all are making the same accusations. Not coincidence, I'm sure, so must be truth in what they claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the alleged victims have a right to be heard, but it is sad that he can no longer defend himself. I was never a fan of his, but over the years he did raise millions for charity, I hope they are not just after money from his estate!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a shame Cleo, that you do not feel the same about the Coptic girls in Egypt, who are kidnapped forced to marry a Muslim. Their id card is then changed to Muslim, and as you know it is illegal to change from a Muslim in Egypt.

 

tum tee indeed <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is about Jimmy Saville's less than savoury activitiea with young british girls but you, ass*?, have to turn the subject to Egypt, well get it into your thick skull, the lady is not biting! :lol::lol::lol:

Edited by Dizzy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put wherever you wish, up your r's if you like, ass*?. I still wont bite. :lol::lol::lol:

It's a sign you have nothing usefull left to say on a subject when you turn it round to Egypt. But, the lady isn't biting, There, I said it again. :P:lol::lol::lol:

Edited by Dizzy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theirs a tv program on itv next week about Jimmy Saville, The question has to be asked, what do these girls want by coming forward now, he is no longer capable of either defending himself or answering to his alleged crimes.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...