Lt Kije Posted June 9, 2012 Report Share Posted June 9, 2012 Yugoslavia, lived peacefully Obs because Tito's secret ~Police made people disappear, as soon as he was gone it was all over, And your example of Nortern Ireland is a bad one as the protestants forced the Catholics into gettos, I actually agree with you on forced marriages, but you are making it very difficult Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fugtifino Posted June 10, 2012 Report Share Posted June 10, 2012 ...the segregation that the liberal luvvies call cultural diversity; has allowed such practises to continue in our midst. You're still off your chump. Forced marriage is no more acceptable in our society than promiscuity would be acceptable in theirs. I fully agree that forced marriage isn't acceptable. On the face of it, it might look like that's the kind of answer you were looking for when starting this thread. But it isn't, is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted June 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2012 In N/Ireland they had 300 years of sectarian history pumped into them from the cradle and had their differences confirmed by different "faith" schools. Think Tito was more benign than you think and certainly more respected; but even if you were right; it demonstrates that strong central Government can control these disparate anarchic elements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt Kije Posted June 10, 2012 Report Share Posted June 10, 2012 How strong a government do you want, how many people would have disappeared on this forum, I don't think you or I would still be on, we would both be dead, or working down the salt mines in Winsford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted June 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2012 Slight difference between repression and not doing those things that promote division and segregation EI - Faith schools, involvement of any religion in public life ( EG Bishops in House of Lords); concessions to seperate cultural developement paid for by the taxpayer; etc etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt Kije Posted June 11, 2012 Report Share Posted June 11, 2012 I agree up to a point, I do not like faith schools of any kind, and I also agree on Bishops in the house of lords, But Bishops in the house of lords had nothing todo with the Liberals Obs, so you picked a bad example their. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted June 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 11, 2012 No, aside from most Bishops being "liberal luvvies" thenselves! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Tessla Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 No, aside from most Bishops being "liberal luvvies" thenselves! Though not when it comes to gay marriage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt Kije Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 No most Bishops are out of touch, not Liberals!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted June 12, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 Perhaps many Bishops are Gay?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazj Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 How strong a government do you want, how many people would have disappeared on this forum, I don't think you or I would still be on, we would both be dead, or working down the salt mines in Winsford I think we should have a very very very strong government in that case! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted June 12, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt Kije Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 I think you would have disappeared too Baz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazj Posted June 12, 2012 Report Share Posted June 12, 2012 I think you would have disappeared too Baz only in your dreams Kije!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Tessla Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 Perhaps many Bishops are Gay?! They're against gay marriage because they're gay - is that a variation on homophobia=repressed homeosexulaity (does that mean Baz is just repressing his republican, subconscious beliefs? ) Or is it that the bishops want an excuse not to marry their lovers? In any case criticism of them has consequences for verily it is written " He who repeatedly bashes the bishop his eyes shall grow dim" I think it's the Book of Dwayne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted June 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 You mean some Priests don't lust after little boys?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Tessla Posted June 14, 2012 Report Share Posted June 14, 2012 You mean some Priests don't lust after little boys?! Most of them don't, I imagine, including female ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.