Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
observer

On your PIP -

Recommended Posts

Thank you Baz. I stand corrected and apologise to anybody who may have found their human rights abused by my previous post. (I still reckon it's Bail out though! :wink: )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Baz. I stand corrected and apologise to anybody who may have found their human rights abused by my previous post. (I still reckon it's Bail out though! :wink: )

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard a top NHS Surgeon claiming that the NHS should treat these women, on the basis that they treat smokers and drinkers, which would seem to justify the removal of the offending articles by the NHS. However, it doesn't follow that the NHS should replace them, after all, they don't give a packet of fags to smokers or a bottle of vodka to a drinker? :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to argue with you Obs but, to be honest, you are confusing the issues here so much it wouldn't be worth the effort :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As these implants were supposedly checked by the EU agency resposible for regulating medical appliances, and were given the CE mark I should imagine it should be up to the EU to sort the mess out. But of course the EU won't because the EU is whiter than white and never makes mistakes. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

 

Oh, and France!! :wink: :wink: :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So perhaps any responsibility of the NHS only goes as far as removing them, rather than replacing them? :unsure:

 

That is what I heard on the radio a week or so ago.

 

In order to prevent potential harm, the NHS would remove if they were asked, but were not liable to replace them as it was a private cosmetic operation which put them there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So perhaps any responsibility of the NHS only goes as far as removing them, rather than replacing them? :unsure:

 

Yes, well that's just what I said a week ago (8th January if you want to check :rolleyes: ). You really need to read what other people are saying, but I suppose the politician in you prevents that? :blink: :blink: :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's slightly more important to know exactly what "the Government" are saying

 

 

You jest. Does any Government know what they are saying and consistently? :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skipper????? :roll: :roll: :roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More than obvious :lol: :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...