Bazj Posted August 1, 2013 Report Share Posted August 1, 2013 good job there were no buildings of historical interest like there were on Omega...... the bulldozers would have been in there 6 months ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted August 1, 2013 Report Share Posted August 1, 2013 As I said earlier, this is not "green belt" and will eventually be developed, dependent on the housing need figures in future - so basically, the application was premature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fugtifino Posted August 2, 2013 Report Share Posted August 2, 2013 Not to worry anyone, but there was just a hint in the inspector's report that if eventually land were needed for housing, a larger scheme (including its own facilities) might overcome the difficulties of a small site with awkward access! Satnam needs Ballater Drive playing fields to overcome this. It's not his. It doesn't figure in the pending core strategy. This may change. obs - well, yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fugtifino Posted October 7, 2014 Report Share Posted October 7, 2014 <bump> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted October 7, 2014 Report Share Posted October 7, 2014 Yep 'bump'... they don't give up do they front page news http://www.warrington-worldwide.co.uk/articles/19353/1/Peel-Hall-under-threat-again-says-MP/Page1.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
observer Posted October 7, 2014 Report Share Posted October 7, 2014 Why would they "give up"? They know the land will eventually be released for housing, depending on the housing land release figures; which are presumably low at the moment, so no need to release this land. My beef would be that, despite all the talk about "affordable" housing; there appears no commonly understood view of what "affordable" means; and any "council" housing appears to be being funded through GGH in other Towns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazj Posted October 7, 2014 Report Share Posted October 7, 2014 looks like some booted the idea back out of the long grass onto the fairway! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil Sid Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 it probably a case of we will put a few different littl eplans in to see what the objections are then we can put the proper plan in knowing that we can get round the objections easily as we know what to expect and plan for it. or is that jus me being suspicious as usual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grey_man Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sha Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 It's probably YET ANOTHER case of.............what Sid said. I don't think it's just you Sid being suspicious, I think there are a lot of people suspicious about this case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahl Posted October 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 lets hope the application is rejected immediately without talks and satnam get the message they are not wanted and hopefully they don't even show their faces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzy Posted October 12, 2014 Report Share Posted October 12, 2014 If it gets rejected straight away wont they just appeal again ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil Sid Posted October 13, 2014 Report Share Posted October 13, 2014 and again and again. war of attrition bit like the tyre wall saga. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.