Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
observer

Which is better?

Recommended Posts

The LibDems are now arguing for tax cuts, albeit for the less well off, whilst increasing the tax take from the rich - fair enough. :? BUT; rather than releasing more cash for (some would argue) the feckless to spend on fags, booze and junk food; would it not be preferable if Government used the money to subsidise those essentials in life to ALL - such as:- healthy food, cheap public transport, cheap rented housing, school uniforms etc; thus making such needs affordable to all, whilst allowing negatives to become more expensive? :shock::wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
would it not be preferable if Government used the money to subsidise those essentials in life to ALL - such as:- healthy food, cheap public transport, cheap rented housing, school uniforms etc; thus making such needs affordable to all, whilst allowing negatives to become more expensive? :shock::wink:

 

You can't do that!!!

That's problem solving.

What would they do to fill their time, if they couldn't shuffle paper and problems. there would be no need for wasteful meetings. :roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice rents are relatively expensive nowadays, given that the place will never be owned; perhaps it would help the less well off if housing were subsidised, plus energy costs? :shock::wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...