Jump to content

Which is better?


observer

Recommended Posts

The LibDems are now arguing for tax cuts, albeit for the less well off, whilst increasing the tax take from the rich - fair enough. :? BUT; rather than releasing more cash for (some would argue) the feckless to spend on fags, booze and junk food; would it not be preferable if Government used the money to subsidise those essentials in life to ALL - such as:- healthy food, cheap public transport, cheap rented housing, school uniforms etc; thus making such needs affordable to all, whilst allowing negatives to become more expensive? :shock::wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites
would it not be preferable if Government used the money to subsidise those essentials in life to ALL - such as:- healthy food, cheap public transport, cheap rented housing, school uniforms etc; thus making such needs affordable to all, whilst allowing negatives to become more expensive? :shock::wink:

 

You can't do that!!!

That's problem solving.

What would they do to fill their time, if they couldn't shuffle paper and problems. there would be no need for wasteful meetings. :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...