Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Observer II

Taxpayer milked again -

Recommended Posts

Princess Eugenie wants a show off wedding, and security will cost the tax-payer £2million.  Her father is estimated to be worth £55million, so why isn't he paying for it ?  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He isn't paying for it because he knows that good old HMG is always willing to throw taxpayers money at a good party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Claiming back our Sovereignty didn’t you bellow lol.  Seems it comes at a price.  Didn’t see that on a bus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our sovereigns are surely part of our sovereignty which you value above all else, except a blue passport of course 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Andrew isn't a sovereign, in fact he is verging on being a marginal royal these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/19/2018 at 1:07 PM, Observer II said:

Princess Eugenie wants a show off wedding, and security will cost the tax-payer £2million.  Her father is estimated to be worth £55million, so why isn't he paying for it ?  

Good point Obs.    I must admit I've never taken much notice of her or her parents...not intentionally but they never get to be in/on the news much so I forget they exist.

A lot of normal brides and groom pay towards their own weddings these days with a little help from parents too so what does Euginie and her soon to be hubby do for a living?  Can't see they will be hard up so maybe they could both contribute too especially as she's the one you say wants a 'show off' wedding.

Maybe long term their wedding and vows would mean more to them if they'd had to work hard to save up and pay towards it all too....... :wink: 
 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A quick google search just showed that Eiginie has an estimated net worth of £3.6 million.  Not bad for a 28 year old !!  Can't find out as quick how much her fiance is worth  and too tired to bother looking harder.

Bit weird that the two of them are blood relatives though although somewhat distant through their great great grandparents lines.    Keep it in the family eh ha ha...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I'm not a Republican by any means, I think the Royals are losing sight of a convention they adopted post- French revolution, to minimise outward expressions of their wealth and privilage, especially in an era of austerity and growing wealth inequality.   One would think our politicians would rein them in, especially those outside the the immediate family, who could join the rest of the prols;  whilst the next in line move to the more modest life styles of their Scandanavian cousins.    

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn’t hear you lot whining about the cost to police Trumps visit earlier in the year, wonder why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, P J said:

Didn’t hear you lot whining about the cost to police Trumps visit earlier in the year, wonder why?

Because we just have to put up with left wing whinge bags, we have got used to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Confused52 said:

Because we just have to put up with left wing whinge bags, we have got used to it.

Haha  so it’s left wing whing bags complaining about the cost of policing Eugenie’s Wedding?  Great post , not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You appear to have diverted yourself there - you posted about Trump and I responded about Trump. Any attempt to link my comment with ones about the Royal Wedding are in your head alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The clue appears to be in the title of the opening post, swivel your eyes upwards and see lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read a news article a couple of weeks ago where a happy couple had set their hearts on a particular wedding then set up a crowd funding page to cover the cost. This wedding paid for by the taxpayer is very similar to crowd funding apart from the fact Joe Public doesn't have a choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Trump visit was a State visit, and thus a State responsibility, made more expensive by the antics of protesters.  The "Royal" Wedding is not a State occasion, but a private one,  no doubt Andrew would like his kids to be on the Royal payroll, but his older brother has knocked him back.  It's his responsibilty to shell out on the wedding, not the tax-payer.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Observer II said:

  It's his responsibilty to shell out on the wedding, not the tax-payer.

I think you’ll find it isn’t , well for the security at least.  If it was you would have nothing to whine about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely if it was he would be picking up the tab, not the police and ultimately the public.  Nothing whatsoever yo do with football clubs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×